<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relevance Versus G-Relevance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/2009/09/relevance-versus-g-relevance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/2009/09/relevance-versus-g-relevance/</link>
	<description>Google AdWords Help from Past and Present Google Top Contributors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/2009/09/relevance-versus-g-relevance/comment-page-1/#comment-32574</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/?p=1037#comment-32574</guid>
		<description>I know this article is relatively old, but I find it interesting that your singular/plural example still holds true today. I have noticed that almost every time I have the opportunity to use both a singular and plural form of the noun in a short keyword phrase, the plural form results in a higher QS (i.e. company vs companies, caterer vs caterers, dealer vs dealers, etc). And it&#039;s usually at least a 2 point difference in QS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this article is relatively old, but I find it interesting that your singular/plural example still holds true today. I have noticed that almost every time I have the opportunity to use both a singular and plural form of the noun in a short keyword phrase, the plural form results in a higher QS (i.e. company vs companies, caterer vs caterers, dealer vs dealers, etc). And it&#8217;s usually at least a 2 point difference in QS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/2009/09/relevance-versus-g-relevance/comment-page-1/#comment-11507</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/?p=1037#comment-11507</guid>
		<description>Excellent post on relevance and why Adwords sometimes gives low QS to what one might think is a relevant KW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post on relevance and why Adwords sometimes gives low QS to what one might think is a relevant KW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/2009/09/relevance-versus-g-relevance/comment-page-1/#comment-4119</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/?p=1037#comment-4119</guid>
		<description>Excellent explanation of the subject. Will be pointing a few ppl to this for reading. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent explanation of the subject. Will be pointing a few ppl to this for reading. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilmington De</title>
		<link>http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/2009/09/relevance-versus-g-relevance/comment-page-1/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilmington De</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adwordshelpexperts.com/?p=1037#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>Thats some  great  fundamentals  there, already  know some of that, but you can always learn . I doubt a “kid” could put together such information as dolphin278 suggested. Maybe he’s just attempting  to be “controversial? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats some  great  fundamentals  there, already  know some of that, but you can always learn . I doubt a “kid” could put together such information as dolphin278 suggested. Maybe he’s just attempting  to be “controversial? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

